|
Deconstructing Jack and Jill By Lev Shtrikman Let’s do one of those post-modern deconstructionalist overwritten crap things on good old-fashioned nursery rhymes, ageless fables. Jack and Jill went up the hill That little rhyme is obviously a thinly veiled expose of feminism and all its horrors. You got the degenderation, the fucking neutering of a country. Jack and Jill. You have two sexes and you make them so similar that they sound like one. First they both go up the mountain to get water. They’re both doing a job that one person could do. The women do less and then the guy picks up the slack. He meets up with her in that dreadful middle, where less is done and more effort is exerted. What’s the consequence of this bullshit philosophy? Of course, it will eventually destroy the male, which is its intended consequence. So it plays up to the feminist expectations and dethrones the male from power. He’s down and he’s powerless, but the author of the fable isn’t ending it where the feminists want him. He knows that as soon as the male falls from his place, society will crumble with him and even the female who pushed him down will be brought down herself by the ensuing chaos. Satire. Fucking satire folks, written long before the media demagogues with their masculinity castration agenda stole the power and forced their idealist crap down our collective throats. Also, Humpty Dumpy=Speculative Investing Okay, these are way too easy. I’m not going to do any anymore.
|
|
